The exercise of flashing headlights come alert other drivers to one upcoming patrol car has been declared as a type of expression defended under the complimentary speech clause of the first Amendment. Hence far, courts have generally taken the practice as protected complimentary speech.(Image via Pxhere, public domain)

The practice, common amongst motorists, of flashing headlights come alert other drivers to an upcoming patrol automobile has been asserted as a kind of expression defended under the totally free speech clause of the very first Amendment. For this reason far, courts have generally interpreted the exercise as protected complimentary speech.

You are watching: Flashing headlights to warn of police

Headlight flashing doesn"t interfere with police duties, court said

When Wallace Wason flashed his headlights come warn oncoming motorists about the police officer who had actually just ticketed him, he was arrested and criminally charged with interfering v an officer in the power of his duties. A jury found Wason guilty together charged in City the Warrensville Heights v. Wason (1976). The Ohio Appellate Court reversed the trial court’s guilty verdict, holding that the defendant’s actions had actually not prevent the officer from issuing citations or indigenous making arrests. The court ruled the there was no proof that other motorists had to be speeding before seeing the defendant’s flashing headlights. Thus, the court held, the defendant had not interfered with official police duties and also was no guilty of the charges against him.

Headlight flashing has been upheld as protected speech

In 1999, a brand-new Jersey appellate court organized that the act of flashing one’s headlights as a warning is a free speech right safeguarded by the first Amendment. That very same year, however, the Pennsylvania supreme Court, in Commonwealth v. Beachey (1999), the review a defendant’s use of his headlights as a day-time warning to other drivers without discussing any an initial Amendment implications. A Tennessee circuit court, in State v. Walker (2003), went back to the constitutional concern by agree the first Amendment together a defense come charges involving speed-trap warnings.

Scholars disagree on whether headlight flashing is "how-to" information

Reviewing this cases, UCLA legislation professor Eugene Volokh explains the action of flashing one’s headlights together “crime-facilitating speech,” comparable to the actions of publishing names of witnesses in the newspaper or to press instructions that explain how to do bombs or go suicide. Volokh claims that a driver through flashing headlights is encouraging other motorists to speed before they with the speed trap and also again ~ they have actually passed the speed trap.

Leslie Kendrich, in a regulation review short article on the subject, however, suggests that headlight flashing is not “how-to information.” the is merely a signal that other vehicle drivers may or might not select to follow. Courts for this reason should not watch headlight flashing as the action of aiding and also abetting criminal task but together constitutionally-protected totally free speech.

See more: Franken And Davis Saturday Night Live, The Franken And Davis Show

This short article was originally published in 2009. Virginia Vile Tehrani is an attorney at Greenblatt & Veliev, LLC.